<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>revenge - LawBizBlog</title>
<link>http://www.lawbizblog.com/articles/technology/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:18:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:13:08 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Revenge and Social Media</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>See today's (Dec 1st) article in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (Personal Journal) entitled <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703300504574567711684786166.html#mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj">&quot;The Dark Side of 'Webtribution.'&quot;</a> This is truly scary where revenge as a motive with little thought to consequences can impact and perhaps destroy someone's reputation. Because hitting the &quot;send&quot; button is soooooo easy and too often &quot;anonymous,&quot; the temptation is huge to lash out at someone for a perceived wrong (whether correct or not).&nbsp; And the internet cannot be erased!&nbsp; We know from the print media that &quot;retractions&quot; are seldom effective, even when made. On the internet, the stain is permanent.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.lawbizblog.com/2009/12/articles/technology/revenge-and-social-media/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawbizblog.com/2009/12/articles/technology/revenge-and-social-media/</guid>
<category>Facebook</category><category>Technology</category><category>media</category><category>revenge</category><category>social</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:18:25 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>