Disclosure of Lack of Malpractice Insurance

Posted on September 1, 2009 by Ed Poll

The California Supreme Court has now made it official, unfortunately, to the detriment of sole practitioners once again.  See Insurance Disclosure as CRPC 3-410, approved by the Supreme Court on August 26, 2009.

See earlier blog posts for the arguments against this new rule.

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.lawbizblog.com/admin/trackback/153805
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Carroll Straus - September 4, 2009 10:56 PM

We had this requirement before. It never stopped anyone from hiring me. No one has ever complained about me or sued me. (Al Family Law, small asset cases.)

The best malpractice insurance is honesty and communication.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.