My Shingle has standing room only
Chevron GC gripes against technology vendors
I’m familiar with Corporate 100, AmLaw 100, etc. When he spoke about the top 5 companies in the world, he jarred my sensitivities. He’s right, of course, and I intellectually knew that. But, he connected with the emotional side of my understanding. He got my attention.
Of course, that’s the function of the keynote presenter – get the attention of the audience. He did that by describing his gripes against technology vendors ... and challenges to law firms.
Discussing how much work Chevron "farms out" (outsources) to outside counsel, and the metric (see below) he uses to increase the size of his internal legal department, Mr. James was more candid than I recall from other GC.
Continue Reading...
IRS changes mileage rates
This is the first time in my memory that the IRS is reasonably current with today's economic realities! <g> If you have to go 10 miles to the grocery store, the IRS believes it will cost you $5.85 for the trip! All the more reason to ride a bike or shop more locally ... How has your life been impacted by "Big Oil"?
LA Tech Show
Travel has become more difficult and expensive, thus localizing efforts to bring the information to the people rather than the people to the information makes sense. Of course, you do remember we’re talking about technology? There should be no reason to travel to see the benefits of technology ... just do it over the web!
On the other hand, as the phone company realized years ago, “high tech, high touch” is required to be truly effective today. Thus, personal contact and demonstration and networking are essential even in a techie world. Hence, the LA show.
There has been so much consolidation in the legal services world of technology, however, that it will be interesting to see just how many vendors are left standing to show in Los Angeles.
Stay tuned for more. As I said, I’m eager to see the 2008 version of the show.
Mike Downey, attorney with Hinshaw and Culbertson LLP in St. Louis, MO talks about Alternative fees
27 minutes, 24 seconds
6.4MB
If all else fails, sue!
Likewise, in our law practice. Clients get angry with us, they have financial reverses, they didn't get the result they expected or, for some unknown reason, they just don't pay their bill. Can we do something to avoid this situation? More so than with weather, the answer is "yes." We can be more proactive in both our intake session --- setting reasonable expectations --- and we can be more vigilant monitoring our clients' behavior after our billings are mailed, making sure we get paid for work we do or we stop working before the client will be prejudiced by our cessation.
I discuss some of these scenarios in my book, Collecting Your Fee: Getting Paid from Intake to Invoice, which is mentioned in today's LawBiz® Tips alongside my article, "If All Else Fails, Sue."
Double billing - A new twist
There is a new twist raised in these cases. Under the "double billing" phenomenon, a lawyer cannot bill two clients for the same minute of time. When using the hourly billing system, you can bill only one client for each segment of time to be billed. In other words, when waiting in court for a matter to be called, and billing client A for that time, the lawyer cannot bill client B for that same waiting time though he/she is doing other work for client B pending the call of the court. Or, while charging client A for travel time, the lawyer cannot charge client B for working on his matter on the plane.
The new twist is that lawyers in two law firms were listed as employees of the New York State's pension funds. This gave them retirement credits from the funds even though they either did no work at all for the funds or were gainfully employed and paid by the law firms, not the funds. This takes "double billing" to entirely new level!
Jay Larock, Director of Product Management for Corel WordPerfect Office talks about the new WordPerfect
19 minutes, 15 seconds
4.4MB
What should I consider when raising my fees?
Budgeting for Success
AVVO runs into roadblock
"Who’s licensed to practice law in Illinois? None of your business.
That’s what the state Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission has told a Seattle company that wants to post the names of lawyers on the Internet and assign grades based on performance, awards, experience and disciplinary records.
Avvo (listen to our podcast interview with Mark Britton, CEO and Founder of Avvo, Inc.) has posted information online about lawyers in more than a dozen states. The company, which started its Web site a year ago, says it has received lists of lawyers from 30 states. Illinois, however, has balked.
Tax man cometh
And California is seriously considering imposing a tax on professional services, even on lawyers! Would this violate the rules of confidentiality by requiring the disclosure of the client's name when creating a report to the State? What other rules of professional conduct might be violated by such a provision? Stay tuned as the legislature continues its deliberations --- and then almost certainly litigation to prevent its implementation.
Mark Britton talks about the Avvo lawyer rating system
41 minutes, 17 seconds
9.7MB
Common traits for successful people
1. They love what they do
This means that they aren't "working," they're "playing" -- Long hours do not become burdensome, but and extension of the joy they take in what they do. If you're going to put in long hours, you ought to be enjoying the time.
2. They're persistent and focused on what they do
This means that they don't allow distractions to take them away from their vision.
3. They're "pushy" about getting to the top of their respective endeavors.
This means they are assertive and directive when needed.
Good traits to have in any field to be successful. A new associate in a law firm would do well to learn these lessons, and more that you can glean from the 70 interviews (including a Canadian Supreme Court Justice) in the book.
Blogging and TechnoLawyer
Respect for the law
In a recent case, the courts have denied a law license to a Michigan applicant because he said he has no respect for the Michigan court that fails to protect the civil liberties of plaintiffs.
"Lawrence says he holds the Michigan court system in low regard because a majority of Michigan Supreme Court justices have been hostile to civil rights plaintiffs. He says he doesn’t regret answering truthfully when the character and fitness committee asked about his political beliefs, and he would do it again." (ABA Journal)
How can others respect the law with decisions such as this?
